Aug
26

A Shameful Squeeze In Waterbury

The law of supply and demand influences almost everything, including legal services. There is only so much chaos to go around. In a bad economy, few clients can afford the legal services they need. Lawyers straining to makes end meet may resort to sharp practices to gain competitive advantage. Sadly, that means some lawyers will disparage other members of the bar.

Such disparagement can get you sued for defamation or other torts. So most lawyers are careful about what they say and how they say it. But there is a forum that makes such disparagement risk free: Whisper into the ear of a federal prosecutor, and suddenly your words are cloaked in either the law enforcement privilege or grand jury secrecy.

Consider Connecticut’s own rotten borough, the City of Waterbury. Federal prosecutors have toppled and imprisoned several of the city’s mayors. They have deposed and imprisoned a governor hailing from Waterbury. And now federal cross hairs are fixed on the back of State’s Attorney John Connelly. To get to Connelly, federal investigators have placed one of the City’s most successful criminal defense lawyers, Martin Minella, under a microscope. Marty’s competitors, fellow members of the bar, are jumping on this federal bandwagon hoping to grab a few new clients.

I represent Marty, so I write this without the detachment you might expect. I rarely write so directly and openly about a case I am handling. But I write about this case because I believe the investigation presents a clear and present danger to the bar of this state. I write to say to those among the Waterbury bar using the pending federal grand jury investigation of Connelly and Marty to settle personal and petty scores of their own: Shame on you.

Marty is a legend. At 62, he is no longer young, but he brings the zeal of a young warrior to every trial. Juries listen to him. He has won 17 of the past 18 criminal cases he has tried in to a verdict. As of today, he has 24 cases awaiting trial on the court’s serious crimes docket. He’s worked doggedly in Waterbury for decades. As a result, his practice thrives. I cannot think of another lawyer in Connecticut who can boast of Marty’s success with a jury in recent years, a fact which pains me to admit as I myself compete in the same market.

Although the Waterbury criminal court is the domain of Connelly, the state’s attorney himself does not try cases against Marty. They are, you see, good friends outside the courtroom. But, as anyone who has ever seen them discuss a case in a judicial pretrial will attest, they spar intensely in negotiations. Suggestions that Marty gets a break from Connelly or his office are ludicrous. One lawyer in Connelly’s office told me just the other day they try harder to beat Marty because he is, well, Marty. His earthy and almost irresistible jury appeal will someday earn him the nickname "My Cousin Marty."

Federal investigators have been fed a line by several disgruntled lawyers in town. The claim is that Marty has somehow procured favorable treatment from Connelly. Federal agents are scouring through tax records, credit card receipts and every record they can use a grand jury subpoena to obtain to try to show some quid pro quo. But they can look until the Republic collapses. There is nothing there. I sense they know this.

In the past week, the federal investigation has taken an ominous turn. Federal agents now appear to be working their way down a list of Marty’s former, and, potentially, current clients. They are asking questions. What did you pay? Why Marty? Did he promise you anything because of his friendship with Connelly?

When the agents don’t get the answers they like, the questions have from time to time turned mean, with witnesses being confronted with salacious allegations about their spouses. Veiled threats have been made. The prisons are aflame just now with chatter. Government agents are trolling the cell blocks looking for people prepared to say just the right thing.

All this is done under the cloak of secrecy, of course. My efforts to get information are met with stone walling. A grand jury is in place, you see.

Just when did the grand jury, an ancient device intended to stand between a citizen and a rogue government, become an investigative tool that could be resorted to by any fool with a chip on his shoulder?
Why, I keep wondering, are competitors of Marty’s in Waterbury so eager to chip away at the reputation of a man who worked for decades to learn to succeed? Don’t these lawyers realize what befalls Marty today awaits them tomorrow? Is jealousy so powerful a drug that it cannot be resisted?

Economics is often called the dismal science. But there is a science ever more dismal. It is the dark science of using grand jury secrecy to try to destroy a man. In Marty’s case the effort will fail. I will see to it. The effort is shameful and a discredit to the bar and the pursuit of justice.

Reprinted courtesy of the Connecticut Law Tribune.
Comments (1)
Posted on August 26, 2010 at 7:47 am by Henry Berry
Pattis is much closer to this matter than I am. Ho...
Pattis is much closer to this matter than I am. However, I offer a broad point of view based on my experiences with state and Federal law-enforcement officials; particularly with the understanding I have gained of the political (denoting mostly professional considerations) and organizational influences in law-enforcement. You'd think--and hope--these would be ancilliary, but I've found they are not in many cases.

The Federal officials may be going after the CT state attorney Connelley because the Federal officials are angered at how state's attorneys tried to manipulate them to participate in the state's attorneys years-long, costly, futile, and manufactured attempts to entrap me and at least defame me. I presume I am not a unique case for the CT state's attorneys. As I've written at other CT blogs (and can only refer generally to here), I have remarked on the criminalization and politicalization of CT state's attorneys during Blumenthal's time as attorney general.

With Connelly (whatever he may have done), Federal officials may be meaning to make a statement that they have had enough with the abuses of CT state's attorneys, especially as these abuses involve and implicate Federal officials. In other words, it's bad enough when state's attorneys trifle with the law, abuse their positions, and waste official resources on their own, but Federal law-enforcement officials do not want to be involved in this.

All I can say in this limited space is that bound in with such matters as Pattis reviews are usually extra-legal elements--which does not mean there are not legitimate and important legal issues. In some of blog postings, I have specified and touched on my experiences and suspicions that Federal law-enforcement people had been cynically duped into seeing me as a threat by Connecticut state's attorneys whose viscious scheme to get me into jail and defame me had gone seriously awry. Two of the highest-placed CT state's attorneys gave up their jobs under pressure in relation to my exposures and accusations as an investigative journalist in this matter.

I write this as someone who is a self-professed law-and-order person. I insist on remaining so. The only way I can do so in good conscience however is to expose serious, chronic, and threatening abuses of law-enforcement officials and take the risks I do in so doing.

To summarize, it may be that the Federal officials have gotten fed up with the CT state's attorneys as I did when I realized their cynical, yet determined abuse of their positions and the law in relation to me.
For Display:
What color is the sun?
Confidential:
(Won't be displayed with comment)

Link must be approved, then will show on this page.

x

About Norm Pattis

Norm Pattis is a Connecticut based trial lawyer focused on high stakes criminal cases and civil right violations. He is a veteran of more than 100 jury trials, many resulting in acquittals for people charged with serious crimes, multi-million dollar civil rights and discrimination verdicts, and scores of cases favorably settled.

Personal Website

www.normpattis.com
www.normpattis.com

Law Firm Website

www.pattislawfirm.com
www.pattislawfirm.com

I believe that the state is a necessary fiction and that failing to combat it is the first step toward tyranny.
– Norm Pattis

Disclaimer:

Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice about your case. You need a lawyer who understands the context of your life and situation. What are offered here are merely suggested lines of inquiry you may explore with your lawyer.

Pattis Video