Jul
27

Jessica Lunsford and Hypocrisy

The rape and murder of nine-year-old Jessisa Lunsford in 2005 was a terrible thing. The fact that her attacker was a violent sexual predator with a past reinforces our fear that the world is filled with dangerous sexual predators. But the fact remains that most people accused of sex offenses are harmless, and do not deserve to be treated like quarantined beasts. Jessica Lunsford's father knows this. He knows it because he might just be a sex offender himself; his son certainly is, at least by standards of current law.
Question? Why were lawmakers so quick to pass Jessica's law, demonizing people without distinction on the urging of a man who had deleted images of child pornography in his own computer the day his daughter went missing in Homasse, Florida in 2005? Why wasn't John Lunsford charged? Why wasn't his 18-year-old son required to register as a sex offender several years later when he pleaded guilty to sexual contact with a minor? Why, finally, the double standards?
Don't get me wrong: I don't think that possession of pornographic images on a computer makes a person a sex offender or a danger to society. If Mark Lunsford had such images in his possession the day his daughter was kidnapped, raped and murdered that should not make Lunsford a criminal.
But the prisons are filled with men who did no more than Jessica's father did. Why are those men in prison? Why are they required to register as sex offenders on release and to be forced into substandard housing, labelled a public health menace and then prosecuted for technical violations of the law?
One reason that sex offender laws have become undiscriminating and driven by hysteria is our tendency to make rock stars of rage out of the surviving members of the family of a violent crime. When Jessica became one of those rare children who are abducted by a stranger, all of our hearts went out to the family. But rather than sequester Mr. Lunsford away and offer him the counseling he needed to cope with shattering grief, we opened the airwaves and legislative chambers to him. We permitted him to make a poster child of Jessica, and politicians piled on to ramp up laws that are already far too draconian.
Why aren't lawmakers extending similar attention to other men who had child pornography in their computers? They are victimized too?
 I blame Oprah, frankly. Panic and sympathy sell. We gave Mr. Lunsford a pass because of what he has lost. It is no wonder that victims of the current sex offender hysteria are outraged at the hypocrisy. Mark Lunsford is permitted to stir the demons lurking in other people's homes without being held accountable for the demons in his own computer. See: child porn on the computer the day she went missing?
It gets worse, of course. Joshua Lunsford, Mark's son and Jessica's brother, was eighteen when he was charged with felony sex assault of a minor. He was permitted to plea to a misdemeanor. He spent 10 days in jail and was not required to register as a sex offender. Our prisons are filled with men serving prison sentences measured in far longer terms for the same offense. Why did Joshua catch a pass?
Once again, don't mistake me. I don't think Joshua should have gone to jail at all or been required to register as a sex offender. My understanding his contact with a 14 year old was consensual. For many years in the United States the ages of consent for sexual contact was far lower than fourteen. Romeo wasn't a felon when he wooed Juliet.
But the Lunsford's ought not to be given a libidinal past because of Jessica's murder. When Joshua turned up at his own sentencing wearing a T-shirt with Jessica's picture on it, where was his father to insist that son not engage in such tasteless theatrics? And why did Clark County Ohio Judge Tomas Trempe give this boy a slap on the wrist while presumably hammering others?
Jessica Lunsford has been used by politicians pandering to frightened voters to increase monitoring of those on sex offender lists and to increase mandatory minimum sentences. But it turns out that Jessica's family knows more truths than one. Losing a child to a stranger is horrible, but not every person possessing child pornography, and not every Romeo in pursuit of a Juliet, are sex offenders. If the Lunsford's believed that, father and son would be registered now, and their neighbors warned that predators are in their midst.
Why Fox News called upon Mr. Lunsford to serve as a spokesman for ramped up sex offender news suggests that the network is using Jessica too. To what end?, I ask. Perhaps it's high time to stop sanctifying the rage of crime victims. We say that no one can be a judge in their own case. But let a child get murdered, and grieved parents get a free pass: they get to sublimate their rage into national fame. Just ask John Walsh, who, decades after his son went missing, still hosts a national television show.
There is something sick about a society that tolerates such rank hypocrisy and hysteria. The illness isn't caused by so-called sex offenders.
Comments (5)
Posted on November 14, 2015 at 9:19 am by Hugo
Here's something to think about ...
Brad Schimel, Wisconsin attorney general, pushes these kinds of laws constantly, and makes a point of cracking down on sex offenders to get elected. Then he turns around and supports laws and policies favoring industrial pollutors that greatly increase the incidence of cancer in the state. But it was the voters that agreed to persecute these "sex offenders", so when those voters are dying from cancer, is that not karma in action?

Posted on August 8, 2010 at 8:49 am by Honest Opinion
I'm OUTRAGED that hundreds of thousands of harmles...
I'm OUTRAGED that hundreds of thousands of harmless citizens suffer the stigma and sadistic consequences of 'MURDER' laws, as grown men who act as perverts and criminals themselves, invent and enact these 'MURDER' laws, HYPOCRITES!

* President Bill Clinton, who exploited a vulnerable female intern for personal sexual gratification and clearly stated to the Nation how, " oral sex, it not sex" ; signed 'Megan's Law' in the U.S. as a response to Megan Kanka's 'murder' and the Kidnapping of Jacob Wetterling , purposely made 'ANY' sexual act or any encounter with a minor a sex crime under Megan's law ; nudity, all under age sexual encounters , sexual contact among 'children & teenagers' all included!
In fact, oral sex between two consenting teenagers is a Megan's 'MURDER' law registrable 'SEX' crime; but, not sex for Presidents, right, Bill? Megan's Murder Law is crafted to expose, civilly exploit and destroy lives of any citizen with any sex related incidence but, Our Legislative leaders claim, SO Registration an it's attributes are not a punishment, the same a way oral sex, is not sex, right, BILL?

* Arnold Schwarzenegger, known for groping woman and even escaped a statutory rape charge with 16 year old , Gigi Goyette Aka Gigi Jeffers, when Schwarzenegger was 28 years old. He put Megan's Law registrants on the internet including 'JUVENILE' convicted as ADULTS signed Jessica's 'Murder' Law in California; Which bans registrants, from living peacefully with in society, including gropers and statutory rapist , minor sexual contact charges like grabbing butts, right Arnold? Hypocrite and politician, have the same meaning, right Billy !

* John Walsh, an 'adult' who admits to having a sex addiction, in which he exploited woman for his 'own' sexual gratification claiming 'Woman are addicting" on Larry King and Senator Mark Foley (Florida), a sexual child predator, who propositioned 16 year old boys;
Join hands to form the Adam Walsh's 'Murder' Act , John Walsh's celebrity made Law, to over ride and replace Megan's 'murder' Law, in HONOR of himself and to collect more of our TAX DOLLARS for ' HIS' National Predator Registry SORNA . He is America's Law Maker, who can unconstitutionally, retroactively gather 'ALL' Megan's 'Murder' Law registrants, including children 14 - 18 with past sex related Megan's 'murder' Law offenses and make demands that over 700,000 citizens should abide to the Adam Walsh 'murder' Act with even stricter rules, harsher restriction and debilitating penalties, because Adam Walsh was murdered over 25 years ago!
George Bush signs the Adam Walsh 'Murder Act to appease and follow John Walsh's personal vengeance,sadistic desires and celebrity wishes and to destroy children branded as Megan's MURDER Law, sex offenders' 14 - 18, too!
Of course he's a perfect example for our young men in America, right? But, When he messes up as a youth , it's covered up and get protection with Daddy's money, wink, wink, Mr. Former President? It's our children who are held accountable to the fullest extent of the LAWS, for LIFE! Right, Bill, Mark, John and George .

What's more sicker then holding children and teenagers more culpable for their immature sexual misbehavior, then the perverted Adults crafting these 'MURDER' Laws ?
Mr. Barak Obama claimed, It's time for change, but, March 3rd 2010, was coercing with John Walsh and promised to hand over more of our tax dollars to fund his Adam Walsh 'MURDER' Law and SORNA Predator registry including CHILDREN! The HYPOCRITES, They'll 'Tax You Without Representation' ; deny you your rights ;expect you to pay for their cause with your hard earned wages, I support: ReformSexOffenderLaw.org

Posted on August 3, 2010 at 1:19 pm by realsexoffenderissues
Mark Lunsford is a hypocrite. As far as I am conce...
Mark Lunsford is a hypocrite. As far as I am concerned Mark has sullied the memory of his daughter knowing he had child porn and that his son was arrested, charged and convicted of a sex crime.

Posted on July 28, 2010 at 12:23 pm by K Mest
A voice of reason in a sea of hysterical thinking....
A voice of reason in a sea of hysterical thinking. How do we get the word out to the rest of the population? I am more worried about a drunk driver on the highway or a murderer in my neighborhood than someone who has viewed some questionable photos or been a teenager with raging hormones. When did it suddenly become politically correct to take away a persons civil rights or inflict cruel and unusual punishments on a small group of individuals?

Posted on July 28, 2010 at 6:36 am by VDog
Bravo!
Bravo!
For Display:
What is the year?
Confidential:
(Won't be displayed with comment)

Link must be approved, then will show on this page.

x

About Norm Pattis

Norm Pattis is a Connecticut based trial lawyer focused on high stakes criminal cases and civil right violations. He is a veteran of more than 100 jury trials, many resulting in acquittals for people charged with serious crimes, multi-million dollar civil rights and discrimination verdicts, and scores of cases favorably settled.

Personal Website

www.normpattis.com
www.normpattis.com

Law Firm Website

www.pattislawfirm.com
www.pattislawfirm.com

I believe that the state is a necessary fiction and that failing to combat it is the first step toward tyranny.
– Norm Pattis

Disclaimer:

Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice about your case. You need a lawyer who understands the context of your life and situation. What are offered here are merely suggested lines of inquiry you may explore with your lawyer.

Pattis Video