Aug
14

Second Verse Same As The First?

One of the most dismal experiences a trial lawyer can have is reading a transcript of a case you have already tried. The only thing worse is having to sit through a read back or replay of testimony> I think of myself as fluent, sometimes even eloquent. My transcripts betray me to be a stuttering mess of non-fluencies.

I am preparing now for a special version of this Hell: the retrial of a murder case I tried last September. The jury could not agree on counts of murder as to one victim and attempted murder as to another. So come this September, we will try the case all over again.

I had hoped this week to travel to Omaha, Nebraska to work with a trial consultant who reads this blog and volunteered his time. I generally don't play well with others, but this fellow reads: We started a correspondence that of sorts around the time I noted with glee the publication of C.J. Jung's Red Book.  I say you've got to love a guy who tried cases and reads difficult books.

Omaha will have to wait, however. I have two lawyers out of the office for the month of August. I am running from one end of the state trying to put out fires. It's too busy a time to leave.

So I sit, staring at transcripts of my work and looking for ways to improve. (The prosecutor told my partner that the verdict was 11-1 in favor of conviction; I have a lot of improving to do.)

It is a close case; the defense is self-defense. My client, a male, claims he was backed into a corner near steep stairs descending to basement by a drug-crazed woman. He shot her dead and wounded a friend of hers as they argued.

It is hard work, reappraising a trial. The thought of trying the case again fills me with dread. There was anger aplenty in the room, with grieving and bitter family members of the victims present daily. The prosecutor became embittered, too. I did not help matters at all. I sometimes attack when no attack is needed.

Jury selection begins August 30. It will take a couple of weeks to pick the jury, given our state's quirky and entirely wasteful manner of picking jurors by speaking to candidates one at a time out of the presence of all other jurors. Evidence won't begin for at least another month. I have time aplenty to ponder a job half done last trial. This much I know; the retrial will not look like the first trial. Oh, the defense will be the same. But I have an opportunity to do better this time around. I will.
Comments (2)
Posted on August 15, 2010 at 5:48 am by Jamison
I guess that would make you "En - er - y the 8th, ...
I guess that would make you "En - er - y the 8th, you are, you are."

Since it is hard to imagine you as a "stuttering mess of non-fluencies," I imagine you are either being too modest or too hard on yourself. Still, considering that the only transcripts you will take the time to review are from cases in which you have lost, you are probably going in with a jaded eye.

When I was a PD in Philly, every single preliminary hearing I ever did was transcribed, and, while my colleagues thought this was a tad self-indulgent, I took the time to review each and every transcript. Sometimes I would cringe. Sometimes I would applaud myself. But it was very helpful to realize how I was coming across. It was also helpful in eliminating verbal tics and in improving my ability to establish a clean record.

Posted on August 14, 2010 at 4:43 pm by William Doriss
'Trial consultant',... I don't like the sounds of ...
'Trial consultant',... I don't like the sounds of that!?! Does the surgeon go to a 'surgical consultant' before picking up the knife in order to operate on the patient?

I remember being at Yale-New Haven Hospital Emergency one nite. The intern was stitching up my severely gashed forehead. When he finished, he called for the approval of the attending supervising physician. She arrived, inspected his work and immediately ordered him to remove all of the stitches and do it over again. I objected, saying, "Let me see! I'm the patient here, and I think it's Ok."

She said, "No it's not. Lie back down there, mister. It has to be done again, properly,"... or words to the same effect. She was my junior in age, but I allowed the intern, also my junior, to do it all over again as instructed. My forehead today is fine; you would never know I had ever been severely gashed and injured.

So what's the point? Beats me. I lost my 'train-of-thought'! Maybe there's some cross-relevance. I give up. Excuse me, I'm having a 'flashback' right now?!? Is there a lawyer in the house,... I mean a doctor?
For Display:
What is the day of the week?
Confidential:
(Won't be displayed with comment)

Link must be approved, then will show on this page.

x

About Norm Pattis

Norm Pattis is a Connecticut based trial lawyer focused on high stakes criminal cases and civil right violations. He is a veteran of more than 100 jury trials, many resulting in acquittals for people charged with serious crimes, multi-million dollar civil rights and discrimination verdicts, and scores of cases favorably settled.

Personal Website

www.normpattis.com
www.normpattis.com

Law Firm Website

www.pattislawfirm.com
www.pattislawfirm.com

I believe that the state is a necessary fiction and that failing to combat it is the first step toward tyranny.
– Norm Pattis

Disclaimer:

Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice about your case. You need a lawyer who understands the context of your life and situation. What are offered here are merely suggested lines of inquiry you may explore with your lawyer.

Pattis Video