Sep
26

What Explains Connecticut's Love Of Prison?

What New England state incarcerates its citizens at a rate comparable to the deep South? Is it Maine, with its rural sensibilities? Rock-ribbed New Hampshire? Or how about Massachusetts, home of Boston, a large, festering city? Surely it could not be bucolic Vermont? Or Connecticut, land of the civilized, and, presumably free?

I’ve got news for you. Connecticut ranks eleven among the states in terms of prison population. We’re right up there with Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas, Alabama, Georgia and Florida, to name a few. Connecticut’s incarceration rate is more than double that of Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

As of January 1, 2010, Connecticut’s prison population was 552 persons per 100,000 population, ranking us eleventh in the United States, just behind Florida and Georgia, which were tied at 553 persons per 100,000 population. Maine was ranked fiftieth among the states at 168. Massachusetts was forty-ninth at 170. New Hampshire was forty-seventh at 190. (Vermont is a mid-range thirty-fourth at 355, followed closely by Rhode Island at thirty-sixth at 349.)

I don’t know about you, but I am stunned by these numbers. It is hard to understand why our incarceration rates represent a regional outlier. It is harder still to understand why we imprison people at a rate consonant with the deep South and the Southwest, regions with legacies of slavery and frontier violence lacking in this the Land of Steady Habits.

The national average for incarceration rates in 2010 was 455 per 100,000 population. Louisiana tops the charts at 877. All of the top ten states but for Alaska are in the South or Southwest. (One might argue that Alaska has the culture of a frontier, Southwestern state notwithstanding is northern locale.)

Connecticut seems to be waking up to the fact that prison is an expensive luxury the state simply cannot afford. Governor Danel P. Malloy is trying to trim $69.7 million from the state’s prison budget. Three prisons have been closed in the past two years: the 220-bed Webster Correctional Institution; the 700-bed J.B. Gates prison; and, just recently the Bergin Correctional Institution, which housed 900 inmates.

How do you close prisons when we incarcerate men and women with the reckless abandon of a plantation owner on a spending spree at a slave auction? You crowd people together in facilities unfit to house them. According to the union representing prison guards, there are nearly 1,000 inmates sleeping in makeshift beds -- mattresses thrown into hard shells euphemistically known as canoes, on the floors of gymnasiums, day rooms, and even counselor’s offices. As many as 110 prisoners are herded into small spaces served by but one toilet. The prisons are bursting at the seams even as we close them to save money.

I mentioned these figures to a judge the other day as the prosecutor and I were playing let’s make a deal with the life of a client. "We can’t afford to house all the people we want to lock up, judge," I said.

"That’s not my problem," the judge responded. "I am not supposed to think about that. That’s a call for lawmakers."

"Really?" I responded. "Why is it that everyone in the courthouse demands that defendants be held accountable for the consequences of their actions, but no one in this courthouse accepts responsibility for what happens to defendants?" An awkward silence descended in chambers. It almost looked as though even the prosecutor blushed for a moment, or perhaps it was simply the red flush of anger coloring his cheeks.

I suspect that by year’s end, Connecticut’s incarceration rate will have fallen, inching closer to the middle of the national pack. But we still lead the region in incarceration. Even New York State, our neighbor to the West, although not a part of New England, incarcerated far fewer than we do, ranking fortieth in the nation at 303 per 100,000 population.

Why the rage to imprison in Connecticut? Why are we out of step with our near neighbors? Are we more dangerous in Connecticut than folks in surrounding states? Or are we merely less realistic and more self-indulgent? Prison is a luxury we cannot afford.

 Reprinted courtesy of the Connecticut Law Tribune

h/t Adam Osmond, All In One Reports, LLC

Comments (4)
Posted on September 26, 2011 at 2:50 pm by william doriss
Excessive Incarceration II
My 3 points below were in jest, obviously. The whole world is laughing at CT, the nutty state. It's crime rate and solved cases rate are no beter than anywhere else: probably worse. CT just likes to lock people up to keep the Prison-Industrial Complex humming. That's the Bottom Line. The Press is MIA.

Posted on September 26, 2011 at 2:46 pm by william doriss
Excessive Incarceration
MJB: Your 2nd point is well-taken, and I have stated the same 100 different ways. The State is totally w/out oversight, accountability or avenues for redress of grievances. All grievances routinely denied. You are only entitled to the "Constitutional rights" they choose to give you, and none other. As to point One: FBI statistics show N.Y.C. to have one of the lowest crime rates of all U.S. cities. Your proximity argument here, I'm afraid, is a non-starter.

Posted on September 26, 2011 at 1:12 pm by MJB
Incarceration Rate
1. Proximity to NYC.
2. A system whose procedural rules and lack of enforcement as to the State runs rough-shod over the accused's constitutional rights.

Posted on September 26, 2011 at 10:54 am by william doriss
Incarceration Rate
Pt. #1: CT has a higher crime rate than its neighbors. Pt. #2: CT is better at "solving crimes" than its neighbors. And Pt. #3: CT has more laws on the books which must be enforced. P.S., and for the record: Ten years ago--when CT attempted to give me 3 life sentences--the state had the 5th highest rate nationwide. So, CT seems to be moving in the right direction u/Rell &Malloy. Too late for many of us whose lives were ruined.
For Display:
What is the month?
Confidential:
(Won't be displayed with comment)

Link must be approved, then will show on this page.

x

About Norm Pattis

Norm Pattis is a Connecticut based trial lawyer focused on high stakes criminal cases and civil right violations. He is a veteran of more than 100 jury trials, many resulting in acquittals for people charged with serious crimes, multi-million dollar civil rights and discrimination verdicts, and scores of cases favorably settled.

Personal Website

www.normpattis.com
www.normpattis.com

Law Firm Website

www.pattislawfirm.com
www.pattislawfirm.com

I believe that the state is a necessary fiction and that failing to combat it is the first step toward tyranny.
– Norm Pattis

Disclaimer:

Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice about your case. You need a lawyer who understands the context of your life and situation. What are offered here are merely suggested lines of inquiry you may explore with your lawyer.

Pattis Video