Mar
13

Who Owns New Haven's Green?

If you are not from New England, odds are you don’t understand the significance of a town green. It is a city’s center, a haven, if you will, from the particular cares and concerns dividing a community. The town green is where the people can and do meet. New England towns typically have greens. They are part of the folklore of the region, a place where town meetings and congregational churches place a premium on civil cooperation and participation.

That’s the vanilla, Norman Rockwell vision of the world.

In New Haven, things are just a touch different. You see, the town green is private property. It is owned by folks claiming descent from the colonists who first set up a plantation there in the 1630s. That was when Charles I ruled England, and before he was beheaded by Parliament.

New Haven’s town green is 16 acres in area. It was a space just large enough to hold the 144,000 folks the town’s fathers thought might be spared destruction when Jesus returned to earth. The green has served as town cemetery – an estimated 5,000 to 10,000 souls still slumber beneath its lawns, a market, parade ground for the town militia, at various times it has housed the state capitol, and it remains the site of several historic churches. Today’s green bustles on a spring afternoon with lunchtime amblers, is the home to summer concerts, and is an island of peace in the middle of a small but bustling city.

For the past five months it has also been home to a tent city constructed by protestors. Tomorrow, the City of New Haven intends to evict the protestors, and to tear down the tents and lean-tos. Why? (Our office is fighting to keep the protestors on the green in order to serve as a visible reminder that for many Americans the rhetoric of the American Dream does not match the reality of American life.)

Has pressure been brought to bear upon the city by the private five-member board that oversees the green? This board is neither elected nor subject to any public oversight. When one member of the board dies or otherwise loses interest, the remaining board members appoint another member for life. Membership on this committee is a blue-chip only sort of thing: The current group consists of the former Solicitor General of the United States and professor of law at the Yale Law School, a sitting federal judge, a retired banker, the president of the Albertus Magnus College, and a descendant of one of New Haven’s original settlers. Call it the one percent of the one percent.

This group takes a counter-intuitive view of the green. "[T]he Green is not and never has been a public square of the City," insists Drew Days, III, the chairman of the group known formally as the Committee of the Proprietors of Common and Undivided Lands in New Haven. He notes that the Connecticut General Assembly long ago dispensed with such things as public notice of the committee’s meetings. The committee operates as a sort of geriatric Skull and Bones Society, a secret society open to membership only upon invitation of those deemed acceptable to current members.

I am guessing that if the next 1,000 people to pass through the green were asked whether they were walking on public or private land they would without hesitation regard the land as public. It’s the town green, after all.

The committee holds legal title to the land, and exercises control over it, holding it in "trust" for the people of New Haven, according to Professor Days. In a statement released today to the New Haven Independent, Professor Days contends the General Assembly has recognized the Proprietors claim to title over the green in a series legislative acts and omissions reaching back to pre-Revolutionary War times. Of course, neither the courts nor the General Assembly have ever squarely addressed the following question: Why is land used and commonly regarded as public held by an hereditary elite? Sure, the Proprietors took possession of the land in the 1630s. Yes, they governed the town for decades. But little things have intervened to change the shape of the social world, things like the American Revolution, and the Connecticut Constitution of 1818.

My office filed suit today asking, among other things, that the Connecticut Supreme Court determine whether a hereditary interest in what amounts to public space violate the Connecticut Constitution’s ban on hereditary titles and offices in this state. The relevant provision reads as follows and is found at Article First, Section 18: "No hereditary emoluments, privileges or honors, shall ever be granted, or conferred in this state." I suppose the Proprietors regard their offices as essentially private, and therefore not conferred by the state. While that may be true, it begs the larger question about who owns the town green. Does it belong to the City of New Haven and its people? Or is it no more than a private theme park, a quaint theater in which we play at being a community of equals, all the while hoping the secret elite owning the stage does not turn off the lights before the final act? At what point does something like adverse possession apply? Hold the land open to the public to use without resitriction and hide your title to the land for one, two, three, no make that now almost four centuries, and the public might just acquire title to the land. 

Funny, isn’t it, how when the state or a municipality wants to take property from a little guy and turn it to public use, the doctrine of eminent domain is relied upon to take property. But when old money owns the public space, it goes underground, conducts its business in secret, seeks Legislative privilege and then asks us to thank it for being able to use their private property.

I never paid attention until recently to who owned New Haven’s green. I assumed it was public space. There are no fences, no signs betraying private ownership. It is served by municipal employees. I was stunned to learn it is a colonial vestige, and that it is governed by folks elected in secret and holding office for life. No wonder the City wants the Occupiers off the green. The 99 percent own less and less in this country. We don’t even own New Haven’s green.

What would be the harm in giving this land to the City of New Haven? None. But asking a rich man to part with wealth is like trying to walk a camel through the eye of a needle. Hence, the enduring significance of Occupy New Haven.

Comments (12)
Posted on March 16, 2012 at 9:36 am by F
Ownership and taxes
Very intersting to learn about that ownership structure. Does the group pay property taxes on the land and do they approve events such as concerts and then get revenues from it?

Posted on March 15, 2012 at 11:20 am by F
Ownership and taxes
Very intersting to learn about that ownership structure. Does the group pay property taxes on the land and do they approve events such as concerts and then get revenues from it?

Posted on March 15, 2012 at 9:21 am by F
Ownership and taxes
Very intersting to learn about that ownership structure. Does the group pay property taxes on the land and do they approve events such as concerts and then get revenues from it?

Posted on March 15, 2012 at 7:14 am by We the People
New Haven Green
It smells like Yale University is all over this one, Graduation of the 1% is approaching.

Posted on March 14, 2012 at 11:59 pm by Kathy Manley
Congrats
Congrats on the TRO! Occupy Albany got ambushed in December when the City got one - improperly - against us and then raided the camp - after telling us (the legal team) the day before in a meeting that they wouldn't do anything like that.

Posted on March 14, 2012 at 9:27 pm by Tony Griego
New Haven Green
The green is public but controlled by the Proprietors as it should be. The green is what it is today because of a group of descendants and appointees who have preserved our local history. No group has been denied. Thousands of people used the green for a public forum doing May Day 1970. Occupy has made its point known so now is the time to leave.

Posted on March 14, 2012 at 4:13 pm by F
Ownership and taxes
Very intersting to learn about that ownership structure. Does the group pay property taxes on the land and do they approve events such as concerts and then get revenues from it?

Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:34 pm by Ren
Public Space
The Green has been widely recognized as one of the country's top 10 public spaces. So let's make sure that it is actually public - in a 21st century (heck, 18th century..) sense of the term.

Posted on March 14, 2012 at 1:04 pm by Jeff Klaus
Attorney fees
Who will be responsible for attorney fees if the proprietors end up having to prepare a legal defense?

Posted on March 14, 2012 at 12:44 pm by F
Ownership and taxes
Very intersting to learn about that ownership structure. Does the group pay property taxes on the land and do they approve events such as concerts and then get revenues from it?

Posted on March 14, 2012 at 8:49 am by BobInThe2nd
Right To Be Annoying
The right to be annoying is a fundamental right of Americans'. And this group certainly exercises that right. Besides fuzzy group thinking and illogical goals it is very interesting who are the stewarts of the green, this undivided space of collected souls of New England, both dead and buried and upright.

Posted on March 13, 2012 at 5:33 pm by william doriss
New Haven Green
I have an idea: Give the New Haven Green to DeStePhony Mayor and his band of illegal immigrants and petty sycophant thieves/liars/cheats.. Oh, I forgot: "It's for the children"?!? Come to think, I thought Yaleski owned the Green. (No skiing or skating allowed.) What was I thinking? And what bout them elm trees? Who owns them? As previously posted by me: A Bermuda Triangle of the Mind. What else could it be?
For Display:
Number of states in the U.S.
Confidential:
(Won't be displayed with comment)

Link must be approved, then will show on this page.

x

About Norm Pattis

Norm Pattis is a Connecticut based trial lawyer focused on high stakes criminal cases and civil right violations. He is a veteran of more than 100 jury trials, many resulting in acquittals for people charged with serious crimes, multi-million dollar civil rights and discrimination verdicts, and scores of cases favorably settled.

Personal Website

www.normpattis.com
www.normpattis.com

Law Firm Website

www.pattislawfirm.com
www.pattislawfirm.com

I believe that the state is a necessary fiction and that failing to combat it is the first step toward tyranny.
– Norm Pattis

Disclaimer:

Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice about your case. You need a lawyer who understands the context of your life and situation. What are offered here are merely suggested lines of inquiry you may explore with your lawyer.

Pattis Video