Updated: Bullies With Briefcases

In the end, the choice of whether to take a criminal case to trial or to enter into a plea agreement with the government belongs to the client, and to the client alone. There are times in which a client rejects his lawyer’s advice, goes to trial, and is badly hurt. Then there are times in which a client decides to avoid the risk of trying a case his lawyer thinks he should have tried, and could have won. Counseling a client on whether to enter a plea is bitter work, call it the devil’s work. I do the devil’s work.

A client of mine entered a guilty plea in federal court this week. His name is Jason Zullo. He was an East Haven police officer when federal law enforcement officers burst into his home with an arrest warrant and guns drawn early one morning, holding his wife at gunpoint as they demanded entry into the children’s bedroom. His wife’s eyes still well up in tears when she describes it now, many months later.

I should have taken delight in the prospect of the government feeding on local law enforcement officers. I’ve put kids through college on the money I’ve earned suing police officers in federal court. But the prosecution of Jason Zullo sickened me; it sickens me still.

Jason was tried with conspiring to violate the rights of East Haven residents. The prosecution had its origins in the overheated imaginings of Yale law students. They decided to take the battle for immigration reform to the courts, and ended up persuading the Justice Department to sign on.

 Jason and several of his colleagues were called “bullies with badges” at a press conference attended by Justice Department hotshots. They were accused of preying upon illegal immigrants, subjecting them to stops without justification, using unreasonable force against them, and otherwise engaging in discriminatory application of the law. The case made national news.

When I read the indictment, the formal document charging Jason and three colleagues with federal crimes, I was stunned. Far from some vast conspiracy targeting illegal immigrants, I read about garden variety police stops of folks driving cars with illegal license plates, the search of a store believed to be selling illegal license plates, and some minor dust ups with folks in a lock up who were, undoubtedly, unhappy to find themselves in police custody. If these allegations amounted to federal crimes, there is not a police officer in the state who can rest secure in the belief that he or she can do the job of policing without facing a stretch in federal prison.

The prosecution of the East Haven police officers radicalized me, all at once transforming me into a defender of cops. I wanted to try this case to a jury of twelve, to tell the world that the conduct charged here was routine, that this criminal case was the wrong place to play out the highly charged debate on immigration reform.

But my client decided to enter a guilty plea to one count of filing a false or misleading police report, a felony that may well land him in prison when he is sentenced early next year. He did not plead guilty to illegal entry into a store. He did not plead guilty to stopping illegal immigrants because of the color of their skin. He did not plead guilty to beating up an arrestee in a holding cell. He never contemplated entering pleas to such counts. He denies to this day that such things occurred.

So to what did he plead guilty? He did not include in a police report that his car jarred a motorcycle in a chase through East Haven, a chase in which the operator of the motorcycle saw the police officer, knew the officer wanted to stop him, and then tried to evade the officer so as not to be issued a summons for operating an unregistered motor vehicle. The motorcycle operator was a white guy. So, too, was the victim in the other case yielding a guilty plea in this case. Sergeant John Miller entered a plea to using unreasonable force against another white guy. Both alleged victims, it turns out, where white Italian males.

None of this stopped the Justice Department from declaring a victory in this case in one of its ubiquitous press releases. But how do you call this case a victory when the scalp you bring home from battle looks nothing like the trophy you eyed when war was declared?

I respect Jason Zullo’s decision to plead guilty. He wanted to avoid the risk of trial. He wants to be home to raise his family. A short stay in prison seemed best to him. He can be home for his kids. Why risk a long, crippling sentence?

But I am still outraged by this particular federal prosecution and disappointed by Jason’s plea. A jury ought to hear both sides of this case. Giving federal prosecutors a license to declare open season on cops isn’t going to make Connecticut a better place to live. Who is going to protect cops from bullies with briefcases?


Sad But True:

A good friend of mine is a New Haven Police Officer. He reports the following incident this morning:

He stopped a motorist for speeding on one of New Haven's main streets. After he stopped the driver, he saw the man was Hispanic. He chose not to issue a citation for speeding, but, instead, to issue a warning. Although he felt confident in his decision to stop the man, and he was confident the man was speeding, he feared federal prosecutors might second-guess his decision to stop a person of Hispanic descent. What if the man claimed racial profiling? Would the federal government open a criminal file, and accuse the officer of violating the man's civil rights?

He didn't want to end up like Jason Zullo, or the other cops in East Haven.

Reprinted Journal Register newspapers.


Why No Pardon For Connecticut Witches?

What’s it going to take to correct an injustice committed 400 years ago? Connecticut Governor Dannel P. Malloy says he is powerless to act. The Queen of England, whose government actually had jurisdiction over the scene of the atrocities, says she needs more information. It is dithering such as this that yields contempt for government.

Connecticut executed 11 people in the early 1600s for being witches. Those prepared today to defend these executions as justified assertions of public authority are few and far between. Times have changed. We still believe that evil stalks the world; we are less inclined to believe that the devil can possess a soul, and turn it to dark and sinister service. Those who harbor such beliefs are now prevented from imposing their idiosyncratic beliefs on the rest of us. It is almost enough to make me believe in progress.

Salem, Massachusetts’ witch trials have become the stuff of legend. Connecticut’s executions, which took place before those in Salem, draw far less attention. But the killings were real enough. The suspects were charged, tried, convicted, and then put to death, killed because they were deemed to be the devil’s tools.

Doesn’t the thought of such a thing produce shame?

My forebears had not even heard of Connecticut, or America, at the time these executions took place. I am the product of a union between a first generation American and a what we now call an illegal immigrant. I bear no responsibility for these deaths, either individually, or out of some residual sense of corporate identity. Yet, when I read about these deaths I cringe in shame. I do not want to be associated with a state than can engage in such folly, and refuse to accept responsibility for the collective madness that gripped a tiny colony facing the terrifying prospect of looking westward into a vast unknown.

Among those seeking a pardon for distant forebears are an an 82-year-old eighth-generation descendant of a Farmington woman and a retired New Haven police officer. Why should they be required to wait another day for justice?

Anthony Griego of Hamden has asked the governor for help. The governor says the state’s constitution ties his hands. So Griego is now asking the General Assembly for help. Griego even took his case to the Queen of England. Her advisors wrote back saying she’d need additional information before she could act. What, pray tell, doth the lady require? Why haven’t Connecticut lawmakers acted?

The descendant of a Farmington woman hanged as witch, Bernice Mable Graham Telian, is also asking lawmakers for help. Thus far, she’s met with failure. Lawmakers are apparently too busy to be bothered.

Virginia and Massachusetts long ago pardoned those executed in another time, another world, for the crimes of being bedeviled. Do we still labor under the spell of a peculiar form of madness in Connecticut that prevents us from acting?

A state that cannot acknowledge error and correct an ancient injustice looks foolish. These pardons should have been granted decades ago, even centuries ago. We call ourselves the Land of Steady Habits in Connecticut. Let’s hope our habits are not so steady that we cannot grant long overdue clemency. 

What, I repeat, would be the harm in granting these pardons?



About Norm Pattis

Norm Pattis is a Connecticut based trial lawyer focused on high stakes criminal cases and civil right violations. He is a veteran of more than 100 jury trials, many resulting in acquittals for people charged with serious crimes, multi-million dollar civil rights and discrimination verdicts, and scores of cases favorably settled.

Personal Website


Law Firm Website


I believe that the state is a necessary fiction and that failing to combat it is the first step toward tyranny.
– Norm Pattis


Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice about your case. You need a lawyer who understands the context of your life and situation. What are offered here are merely suggested lines of inquiry you may explore with your lawyer.

Pattis Video